User: CWO_19
| Name: | Nate Gregg |
| Registered on: | 2021-05-20 01:08:41 |
| Last Login: | 2024-11-18 18:26:04 |
User Notes:
Owns: 626 Scenarios
Played: 187 (94 unique scenarios: 15%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 954 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-10 to 2021-01-09 [30 days])
| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.66690790840272 vs John Barkoviak (879.39938167001) | 979 |
| 2020-01-30 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.4698153199961 vs Chris Gregg (1000) | 996 |
| 2020-01-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.96590976012] expected: 0.48134921342766 vs cgregg (983) | 1011 |
| 2020-03-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1011.3690845898] expected: 0.4379090278333 vs cgregg (968) | 993 |
| 2020-03-01 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.51009127569683 vs Chris Gregg (985.98691110933) | 977 |
| 2020-03-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.6770791777] expected: 0.53637821849608 vs cgregg (1002) | 962 |
| 2020-03-15 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.42173360720424 vs Chris Gregg (1016.8358970081) | 949 |
| 2020-03-30 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.3850468633599 vs Chris Gregg (1030.3313724387) | 969 |
| 2020-03-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.67850037248] expected: 0.56060607359511 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49127897191446 vs Chris Gregg (993.06060564496) | 1003 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.5376599479665 vs Chris Gregg (976.78153274622) | 1002 |
| 2020-05-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1001.7948816651] expected: 0.46580985212715 vs cgregg (978) | 985 |
| 2020-05-15 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.48547753018357 vs Chris Gregg (995.09408473193) | 969 |
| 2020-06-15 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.44037558843236 vs Chris Gregg (1010.6293656978) | 987 |
| 2020-06-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 986.90798117016] expected: 0.50876622146799 vs cgregg (993) | 1003 |
| 2020-07-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1003.1885002571] expected: 0.46238293362942 vs cgregg (977) | 986 |
| 2020-07-04 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.48819605393428 vs Chris Gregg (994.20374612386) | 970 |
| 2020-07-15 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.44293546837907 vs Chris Gregg (1009.8260198498) | 956 |
| 2020-07-29 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.57886104725254 vs John Barkoviak (900.7404347389) | 969 |
| 2020-08-01 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.42150331104687 vs Chris Gregg (1023.9999548379) | 956 |
| 2020-08-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.5118940465] expected: 0.61516674985275 vs cgregg (1037) | 943 |
| 2020-08-03 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.57952950717067 vs John Barkoviak (887.26398825098) | 924 |
| 2020-08-12 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.52615515460166 vs John Barkoviak (905.80893248044) | 907 |
| 2020-08-29 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.47749895174197 vs John Barkoviak (922.6458974277) | 924 |
| 2020-10-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 923.72003354426] expected: 0.67286448769731 vs cgregg (1049) | 945 |
| 2020-10-20 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.38349829695012 vs Chris Gregg (1027.4683363937) | 965 |
| 2020-11-05 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.438800192058 vs Chris Gregg (1007.7402818961) | 983 |
| 2020-11-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 982.95839385414] expected: 0.51013229854108 vs cgregg (990) | 999 |
| 2020-11-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.28262740746] expected: 0.46367946192206 vs cgregg (974) | 1014 |
| 2020-11-10 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.57826898398945 vs Chris Gregg (959.16225721849) | 1027 |
| 2020-11-13 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.6149555394944 vs Chris Gregg (945.66686470616) | 1007 |
| 2020-11-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1007.3214227362] expected: 0.43939403543463 vs cgregg (965) | 989 |
| 2020-11-18 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.50872103310502 vs Chris Gregg (982.93939086609) | 1005 |
| 2020-11-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1004.7209269406] expected: 0.44592751277133 vs cgregg (967) | 1019 |
| 2020-11-26 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.59422975704112 vs Chris Gregg (952.73031959132) | 1032 |
| 2020-11-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1031.9846477747] expected: 0.37063206713369 vs cgregg (940) | 1044 |
| 2020-12-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1043.844873923] expected: 0.33920103527458 vs cgregg (928) | 1055 |
| 2020-12-04 | Rated: 1055. expected: 0.68859391343703 vs Chris Gregg (917.14556687121) | 1065 |
| 2020-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1064.96499477] expected: 0.28713908719694 vs cgregg (907) | 1074 |
| 2020-12-10 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.73384563713314 vs Chris Gregg (897.8115492097) | 1083 |
| 2020-12-20 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.75307085011666 vs Chris Gregg (889.29460959796) | 1059 |
| 2020-12-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1058.9017327963] expected: 0.30156050293583 vs cgregg (913) | 1037 |
| 2020-12-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1036.5516688902] expected: 0.35787978629428 vs cgregg (935) | 1016 |
| 2020-12-27 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.58613021193079 vs Chris Gregg (955.54784683858) | 997 |
| 2021-01-02 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.53261576976725 vs Chris Gregg (974.30401362037) | 980 |
| 2021-01-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 979.95629536745] expected: 0.51588781803213 vs cgregg (991) | 964 |
| 2021-01-09 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.4391527576615 vs Chris Gregg (1006.491589823) | 950 |
| 2021-01-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 949.94711175483] expected: 0.60085126388841 vs cgregg (1021) | 937 |
| 2021-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 937.17435219926] expected: 0.63584453953399 vs cgregg (1034) | 958 |
| 2021-01-26 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.42058697380521 vs Chris Gregg (1013.6529747349) | 977 |
| 2021-02-10 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.47395867016025 vs Chris Gregg (995.11175789668) | 994 |
| 2021-02-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 993.83332255487] expected: 0.47722977810968 vs cgregg (978) | 1009 |
| 2021-02-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1009.1046754544] expected: 0.43403677279259 vs cgregg (963) | 991 |
| 2021-02-25 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.51422782725191 vs Chris Gregg (981.11082327064) | 975 |
| 2021-03-26 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.30820504329059 vs Martin Vicca (1115.4550602522) | 965 |
| 2021-04-16 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.28437501683407 vs Martin Vicca (1125.3176216375) | 956 |
| 2021-06-02 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.57156762520485 vs John Barkoviak (905.92586388344) | 938 |
| 2021-06-16 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.51982632942545 vs John Barkoviak (924.21602788999) | 953 |
| 2021-08-07 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56319649225091 vs John Barkoviak (908.85047043161) | 935 |
| 2021-09-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 934.97771224797] expected: 0.58971454551369 vs cgregg (998) | 954 |
| 2021-09-03 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.46389919735015 vs Chris Gregg (979.12913454356) | 971 |
| 2021-09-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.47117243992165 vs Alan Lynott (991.0536803935) | 972 |
| 2021-09-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 971.92248192251] expected: 0.4857242816632 vs cgregg (962) | 955 |
| 2021-09-14 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.46629411490622 vs Chris Gregg (978.45682298678) | 940 |
| 2021-09-18 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.42378128468713 vs Chris Gregg (993.37823466378) | 958 |
| 2021-09-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 958.43899889001] expected: 0.52381516246585 vs cgregg (975) | 975 |
| 2021-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 975.20108408892] expected: 0.47526585553356 vs cgregg (958) | 958 |
| 2021-09-24 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.47585389660825 vs Chris Gregg (974.79149262293) | 943 |
| 2021-09-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 942.77267530854] expected: 0.56755004812837 vs cgregg (990) | 929 |
| 2021-09-29 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.39393425230173 vs Chris Gregg (1003.8383984599) | 916 |
| 2021-10-06 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.35934599511443 vs Chris Gregg (1016.4442945335) | 905 |
| 2021-10-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 904.50092815634] expected: 0.67060392934068 vs cgregg (1028) | 894 |
| 2021-10-13 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.30321326094504 vs Chris Gregg (1038.5406742611) | 916 |
| 2021-10-26 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.35961213962006 vs Chris Gregg (1016.2434986113) | 936 |
| 2021-10-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 936.49241153216] expected: 0.58481059583575 vs cgregg (996) | 955 |
| 2021-11-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.2063505989] expected: 0.5313225118838 vs cgregg (977) | 940 |
| 2021-11-09 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.42572306194546 vs Chris Gregg (991.99767961972) | 926 |
| 2021-11-16 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.38738105580533 vs Chris Gregg (1005.620817602) | 914 |
| 2021-11-16 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 913.60380621423] expected: 0.64587426134328 vs cgregg (1018) | 902 |
| 2021-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 902.27178257721] expected: 0.67469691555224 vs cgregg (1029) | 924 |
| 2021-12-26 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.38221792818211 vs Chris Gregg (1007.4096987023) | 944 |
| 2021-12-29 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.43752424628149 vs Chris Gregg (987.64067240416) | 930 |
| 2021-12-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 929.99922411899] expected: 0.6021591631449 vs cgregg (1002) | 917 |
| 2022-01-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 917.26831733963] expected: 0.63705132425463 vs cgregg (1015) | 938 |
| 2022-01-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.41923892931353 vs Chris Gregg (994.61435762385) | 957 |
| 2022-10-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 956.58435426197] expected: 0.52791231074223 vs cgregg (976) | 973 |
| 2022-10-05 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.51998326317408 vs Chris Gregg (959.10680605625) | 988 |
| 2022-10-13 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.56334404686917 vs Chris Gregg (943.74627047782) | 1002 |
| 2022-10-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1001.9729905002] expected: 0.39787915458798 vs cgregg (930) | 1015 |
| 2022-10-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1014.705123447] expected: 0.36298402657769 vs cgregg (917) | 1026 |
| 2022-10-22 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.66692692381961 vs Chris Gregg (905.38451114951) | 1037 |
| 2022-11-06 | Rated: 1037. expected: 0.69402274924122 vs Chris Gregg (894.72617271174) | 1015 |
| 2022-11-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1014.7912720243] expected: 0.36286936652783 vs cgregg (917) | 994 |
| 2022-11-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 994.40309175317] expected: 0.4181338703103 vs cgregg (937) | 1008 |
| 2022-11-14 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.61910047688847 vs Chris Gregg (923.61971615007) | 1020 |
| 2022-11-27 | Rated: 1020. expected: 0.65134891421212 vs Chris Gregg (911.4309314105) | 1031 |
| 2022-11-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1031.1568347452] expected: 0.31973292699106 vs cgregg (900) | 1041 |
| 2022-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1041.3882884089] expected: 0.29495038086329 vs cgregg (890) | 1019 |
| 2022-12-05 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.64855845738034 vs Chris Gregg (912.56158781237) | 998 |
| 2022-12-19 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.59202770203404 vs Chris Gregg (933.31545844855) | 995 |
| 2022-12-26 | Rated: 995. expected: 0.58373684656127 vs Chris Gregg (936.26034491363) | 976 |
| 2022-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.32042091004] expected: 0.46935590349097 vs cgregg (955) | 959 |
| 2023-01-05 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.48132808598697 vs Chris Gregg (971.98061108829) | 944 |
| 2023-01-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 943.59750124842] expected: 0.56213831689066 vs cgregg (987) | 930 |
| 2023-01-07 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 929.58592738892] expected: 0.60134979832927 vs cgregg (1001) | 949 |
| 2023-01-07 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.45299835004805 vs Chris Gregg (981.75680645346) | 967 |
| 2023-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 966.50405279846] expected: 0.49639644074101 vs cgregg (964) | 982 |
| 2023-01-26 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.54860995964519 vs Chris Gregg (948.11531389629) | 996 |
| 2023-02-03 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.5887488344186 vs Chris Gregg (933.67083260493) | 977 |
| 2023-02-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 977.1600372986] expected: 0.46528684588065 vs cgregg (953) | 960 |
| 2023-02-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 960.04921636679] expected: 0.51431641447579 vs cgregg (970) | 977 |
| 2023-02-19 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.53370775070309 vs Chris Gregg (953.54187473677) | 992 |
| 2023-03-05 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.57622046197091 vs Chris Gregg (938.62052275927) | 974 |
| 2023-03-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 973.56094521693] expected: 0.47618491778825 vs cgregg (957) | 957 |
| 2023-03-18 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.47589612245544 vs Chris Gregg (973.76208263078) | 974 |
| 2023-03-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 973.77132408143] expected: 0.4758828538638 vs cgregg (957) | 989 |
| 2023-03-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 988.99957540507] expected: 0.43277175565144 vs cgregg (942) | 1003 |
| 2023-03-21 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.60607990034187 vs Chris Gregg (928.15130381915) | 1016 |
| 2023-03-25 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.64066705147788 vs Chris Gregg (915.54586063009) | 995 |
| 2023-03-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.49865435271] expected: 0.41520189152421 vs cgregg (936) | 977 |
| 2023-04-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.78511488148] expected: 0.62158772443715 vs jrwusmc (1063) | 997 |
| 2023-06-10 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49568276024494 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1013 |
| 2023-06-10 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49568276024494 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1013 |
| 2023-07-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1013.1381516722] expected: 0.30127393753276 vs wwillow (867) | 991 |
| 2023-07-18 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.59125262458501 vs John Barkoviak (926.87275818364) | 1004 |
| 2023-07-19 | Rated: 1004. expected: 0.57045693435398 vs Chris Gregg (954.71353947123) | 1018 |
| 2023-07-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1017.7453781007] expected: 0.39131645802979 vs cgregg (941) | 1030 |
| 2023-08-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1030.2675047576] expected: 0.35693340142791 vs cgregg (928) | 1010 |
| 2023-08-05 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.58748368016703 vs Chris Gregg (948.57813115431) | 991 |
| 2023-08-17 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.5339430663076 vs Chris Gregg (967.37760891965) | 974 |
| 2023-08-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 973.91382187816] expected: 0.51451110088136 vs cgregg (984) | 958 |
| 2023-08-19 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.4405085499965 vs Chris Gregg (999.5356447718) | 976 |
| 2023-08-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 975.90372640011] expected: 0.50877234269082 vs cgregg (982) | 992 |
| 2023-08-22 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.53774902021809 vs Chris Gregg (965.71928503389) | 1007 |
| 2023-08-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1006.792031353] expected: 0.42039191578887 vs cgregg (951) | 1020 |
| 2023-09-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1020.2445726583] expected: 0.38380288175819 vs cgregg (938) | 1001 |
| 2023-09-01 | Rated: 1001. expected: 0.56196714004969 vs Chris Gregg (957.71830778374) | 983 |
| 2023-09-02 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.51050219169994 vs Chris Gregg (975.70125626533) | 999 |
| 2023-09-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 998.6639298656] expected: 0.44458669095635 vs cgregg (960) | 1013 |
| 2023-09-10 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.59555751294306 vs Chris Gregg (945.7732258894) | 1026 |
| 2023-09-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1025.9421595858] expected: 0.36934726344866 vs cgregg (933) | 1038 |
| 2023-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1037.7612720162] expected: 0.33801963475517 vs cgregg (921) | 1017 |
| 2023-09-24 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.60603582737167 vs Chris Gregg (942.18337168783) | 998 |
| 2023-10-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 997.60685352411] expected: 0.44893626988495 vs cgregg (962) | 980 |
| 2023-10-21 | Rated: 980. expected: 0.50052665949636 vs Chris Gregg (979.63403936368) | 964 |
| 2023-10-29 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.4545762912126 vs Chris Gregg (995.65089246757) | 965 |
| 2023-11-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.4580802938922 vs Chris Gregg (994.19733378637) | 982 |
| 2023-11-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 982.34143059545] expected: 0.49231366902032 vs cgregg (977) | 998 |
| 2023-11-30 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.55269688454947 vs Chris Gregg (961.24596259135) | 980 |
| 2023-11-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.31369969442] expected: 0.49810944317658 vs cgregg (979) | 964 |
| 2024-02-03 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.44837645268904 vs J. Boord (1000) | 950 |
| 2024-02-17 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.43551389267582 vs Chris Gregg (995.06049781835) | 968 |
| 2024-02-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.06355543437] expected: 0.51285774218512 vs cgregg (977) | 984 |
| 2024-02-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.4750031843] expected: 0.63277254893904 vs jrwusmc (1079) | 973 |
| 2024-03-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 972.72372475035] expected: 0.67790793322301 vs jrwusmc (1102) | 994 |
| 2024-03-28 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.54793526302002 vs Chris Gregg (960.58855225008) | 976 |
| 2024-03-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.46607158336] expected: 0.50220748609825 vs cgregg (978) | 961 |
| 2024-04-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 960.5367111385] expected: 0.54800918160916 vs cgregg (994) | 978 |
| 2024-04-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.07300495] expected: 0.49701674146669 vs cgregg (976) | 994 |
| 2024-04-11 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 993.97754067693] expected: 0.63477330880312 vs jrwusmc (1090) | 982 |
| 2024-04-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 982.29028655863] expected: 0.46796563886271 vs cgregg (960) | 997 |
| 2024-04-26 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.57424487931137 vs Chris Gregg (945.02509955639) | 979 |
| 2024-04-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.62416386204] expected: 0.47753016560293 vs cgregg (963) | 962 |
| 2024-04-28 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.47452234412176 vs Chris Gregg (979.71903470071) | 947 |
| 2024-04-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 946.8152849881] expected: 0.5689021891834 vs cgregg (995) | 933 |
| 2024-06-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 933.02015504197] expected: 0.60763340314137 vs cgregg (1009) | 920 |
| 2024-06-04 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.35787441263586 vs Chris Gregg (1021.5557310995) | 909 |
| 2024-06-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 908.54801879565] expected: 0.77055699813649 vs jrwusmc (1119) | 901 |
| 2024-06-20 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.3186685256346 vs Chris Gregg (1033.0077123038) | 923 |
| 2024-06-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 922.80260717969] expected: 0.62426832012885 vs cgregg (1011) | 943 |
| 2024-07-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 942.77919342382] expected: 0.65870033195988 vs jrwusmc (1057) | 932 |
| 2024-08-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 931.85760404653] expected: 0.51459193631976 vs wwillow (942) | 948 |
| 2024-08-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 948.32454600876] expected: 0.6809160617404 vs jrwusmc (1080) | 970 |
| 2024-08-26 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.46978174782989 vs Chris Gregg (991.02341375588) | 987 |
| 2024-08-31 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.51861868217992 vs Chris Gregg (974.05642968643) | 970 |
| 2024-10-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 970.40420217024] expected: 0.52960506583418 vs cgregg (991) | 955 |
| 2024-10-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.35156427694] expected: 0.57237698379836 vs cgregg (1006) | 942 |
| 2024-10-31 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 941.66762775848] expected: 0.62039205315351 vs jrwusmc (1027) | 962 |
| 2024-11-08 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 961.5201734594] expected: 0.58337336536135 vs cgregg (1020) | 948 |
| 2024-11-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 948.18812115096] expected: 0.61968617652764 vs cgregg (1033) | 968 |
| 2024-11-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.01807879984] expected: 0.56437490420664 vs cgregg (1013) | 954 |
Games logged: 96 Played Won Lost
Games won: 92
Attacking Win: 48.45% (97 attempts)
Defending Win: 47.78% (90 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
| Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |
| Grey rows indicate games logged by your opponent. |
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-10 to 2021-01-09 [30 days])