User: CWO_19
| Name: | Nate Gregg |
| Registered on: | 2021-05-20 01:08:41 |
| Last Login: | 2025-08-04 01:51:35 |
User Notes:
Owns: 626 Scenarios
Played: 195 (101 unique scenarios: 16%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 915 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-10 to 2021-01-09 [30 days])
| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.66702779795716 vs John Barkoviak (879.30561800098) | 979 |
| 2020-01-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.65511046537] expected: 0.5306791772697 vs cgregg (1000) | 996 |
| 2020-01-30 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.51867352728861 vs Chris Gregg (983.01826632737) | 1011 |
| 2020-03-01 | Rated: 1011. expected: 0.56211236221568 vs Chris Gregg (967.61581920061) | 993 |
| 2020-03-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 993.0124044091] expected: 0.48990970895012 vs cgregg (986) | 977 |
| 2020-03-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.6895150955] expected: 0.53636041646168 vs cgregg (1002) | 962 |
| 2020-03-15 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.42173280747797 vs Chris Gregg (1016.8364666732) | 949 |
| 2020-03-30 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.38504612176111 vs Chris Gregg (1030.3319165125) | 969 |
| 2020-03-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.67852410364] expected: 0.56060603994499 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49127897036529 vs Chris Gregg (993.06060672176) | 1003 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.53765994649659 vs Chris Gregg (976.78153377345) | 1002 |
| 2020-05-15 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.534503062534 vs Chris Gregg (977.98665206134) | 985 |
| 2020-05-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.89590199891] expected: 0.51453686790044 vs cgregg (995) | 969 |
| 2020-06-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 969.36108177173] expected: 0.55963796323061 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
| 2020-06-15 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49123440241734 vs Chris Gregg (993.09158517662) | 1003 |
| 2020-07-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1003.2804991226] expected: 0.4622512886351 vs cgregg (977) | 986 |
| 2020-07-04 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.4881899948388 vs Chris Gregg (994.20795876368) | 970 |
| 2020-07-15 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.44292976027416 vs Chris Gregg (1009.8300385985) | 956 |
| 2020-07-29 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.57898723836956 vs John Barkoviak (900.65050753561) | 969 |
| 2020-08-01 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.42149792654499 vs Chris Gregg (1024.0037909273) | 956 |
| 2020-08-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.51206635056] expected: 0.61516651504269 vs cgregg (1037) | 943 |
| 2020-08-03 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.57964997960286 vs John Barkoviak (887.17809916343) | 924 |
| 2020-08-12 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.52627288647199 vs John Barkoviak (905.72689851072) | 907 |
| 2020-08-29 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.47761135939263 vs John Barkoviak (922.56763087783) | 924 |
| 2020-10-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 923.71643649944] expected: 0.6728690454976 vs cgregg (1049) | 945 |
| 2020-10-20 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.3834984954493 vs Chris Gregg (1027.4681905441) | 965 |
| 2020-11-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 964.72804814562] expected: 0.56195333779898 vs cgregg (1008) | 983 |
| 2020-11-05 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.48990238858973 vs Chris Gregg (990.01749319043) | 999 |
| 2020-11-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.32312356513] expected: 0.46362149127804 vs cgregg (974) | 1014 |
| 2020-11-10 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.57826637975785 vs Chris Gregg (959.1641122791) | 1027 |
| 2020-11-13 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.61495312454984 vs Chris Gregg (945.66863643135) | 1007 |
| 2020-11-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1007.3215000144] expected: 0.4393939258563 vs cgregg (965) | 989 |
| 2020-11-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 989.38210564181] expected: 0.49081644458175 vs cgregg (983) | 1005 |
| 2020-11-18 | Rated: 1005. expected: 0.55405143630197 vs Chris Gregg (967.29387377338) | 1019 |
| 2020-11-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1019.2703540383] expected: 0.4057693079595 vs cgregg (953) | 1032 |
| 2020-11-26 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.6293678926905 vs Chris Gregg (940.0153821453) | 1044 |
| 2020-12-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1043.8602274339] expected: 0.33918122530763 vs cgregg (928) | 1055 |
| 2020-12-04 | Rated: 1055. expected: 0.68859313094486 vs Chris Gregg (917.14620079016) | 1065 |
| 2020-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1064.9650198098] expected: 0.28713905769282 vs cgregg (907) | 1074 |
| 2020-12-10 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.73384563607162 vs Chris Gregg (897.81155015383) | 1083 |
| 2020-12-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1082.5169396457] expected: 0.24713093121457 vs cgregg (889) | 1058 |
| 2020-12-20 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.69723352401003 vs Chris Gregg (913.09181020113) | 1036 |
| 2020-12-27 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.64085597518165 vs Chris Gregg (935.40328296946) | 1015 |
| 2020-12-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1015.4926087942] expected: 0.41521034156277 vs cgregg (956) | 997 |
| 2021-01-02 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.53202926517714 vs Chris Gregg (974.71326906999) | 980 |
| 2021-01-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 979.97506351433] expected: 0.51729836805516 vs cgregg (992) | 965 |
| 2021-01-09 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.43921675490007 vs Chris Gregg (1007.4464522222) | 951 |
| 2021-01-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.9450638432] expected: 0.60085409116392 vs cgregg (1022) | 938 |
| 2021-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 938.17239476044] expected: 0.63584714857558 vs cgregg (1035) | 959 |
| 2021-01-26 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.42058709092513 vs Chris Gregg (1014.6528912456) | 978 |
| 2021-02-10 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.4739587846062 vs Chris Gregg (996.11167815519) | 995 |
| 2021-02-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 994.8333188926] expected: 0.47722978336918 vs cgregg (979) | 1010 |
| 2021-02-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1010.1046719604] expected: 0.4340367777333 vs cgregg (964) | 992 |
| 2021-02-25 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.51422782747925 vs Chris Gregg (982.11082311253) | 976 |
| 2021-03-26 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.30944746950169 vs Martin Vicca (1115.4439141783) | 966 |
| 2021-04-16 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.28551434381326 vs Martin Vicca (1125.3462332024) | 957 |
| 2021-06-02 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.57308183797579 vs John Barkoviak (905.85119437839) | 939 |
| 2021-06-16 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.52130067203728 vs John Barkoviak (924.18981319362) | 954 |
| 2021-08-07 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.56458243247113 vs John Barkoviak (908.87143469881) | 936 |
| 2021-09-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 935.93336216092] expected: 0.58977631417442 vs cgregg (999) | 955 |
| 2021-09-03 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.46390202707441 vs Chris Gregg (980.12715794642) | 972 |
| 2021-09-08 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.47259799196354 vs Alan Lynott (991.05996279422) | 973 |
| 2021-09-14 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.51442741314573 vs Chris Gregg (962.9720228128) | 957 |
| 2021-09-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 956.53832277934] expected: 0.53227999189055 vs cgregg (979) | 942 |
| 2021-09-18 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.42576618302566 vs Chris Gregg (993.9670402595) | 960 |
| 2021-09-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 960.37548214318] expected: 0.52247034280764 vs cgregg (976) | 977 |
| 2021-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 977.09453311302] expected: 0.47398339143911 vs cgregg (959) | 960 |
| 2021-09-24 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.47723091420568 vs Chris Gregg (975.83253147395) | 945 |
| 2021-09-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 944.72861074542] expected: 0.56619895699439 vs cgregg (991) | 931 |
| 2021-09-29 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.39524995321168 vs Chris Gregg (1004.8816333762) | 918 |
| 2021-10-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 918.35200149723] expected: 0.63959804860486 vs cgregg (1018) | 907 |
| 2021-10-06 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.33062583709636 vs Chris Gregg (1029.5328624446) | 896 |
| 2021-10-13 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.30373378359827 vs Chris Gregg (1040.1128892317) | 918 |
| 2021-10-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.36015733808438 vs Chris Gregg (1017.8323703069) | 938 |
| 2021-10-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 938.4749651813] expected: 0.58343661497332 vs cgregg (997) | 957 |
| 2021-11-09 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.46934212927321 vs Chris Gregg (978.33002832085) | 942 |
| 2021-11-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 941.98105186326] expected: 0.57289894051905 vs cgregg (993) | 928 |
| 2021-11-16 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 928.31381795987] expected: 0.61134136163246 vs cgregg (1007) | 916 |
| 2021-11-16 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.35538954849745 vs Chris Gregg (1019.4370764278) | 905 |
| 2021-12-26 | Rated: 905. expected: 0.32646484093858 vs Chris Gregg (1030.8095419797) | 927 |
| 2021-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 926.55312508997] expected: 0.61647249386688 vs cgregg (1009) | 946 |
| 2021-12-29 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.43804534672139 vs Chris Gregg (989.27288019626) | 932 |
| 2021-12-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 931.98254890492] expected: 0.60080233952808 vs cgregg (1003) | 919 |
| 2022-01-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 919.20822376981] expected: 0.63579939134792 vs cgregg (1016) | 940 |
| 2022-01-15 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.42058494710381 vs Chris Gregg (995.65441947687) | 959 |
| 2022-10-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 958.54128169268] expected: 0.5265392654975 vs cgregg (977) | 975 |
| 2022-10-05 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.52135679552835 vs Chris Gregg (960.15074350408) | 990 |
| 2022-10-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 990.31658254309] expected: 0.43515152180382 vs cgregg (945) | 1004 |
| 2022-10-13 | Rated: 1004. expected: 0.60343279990641 vs Chris Gregg (931.07515130228) | 1017 |
| 2022-10-22 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.63822618980932 vs Chris Gregg (918.38500089928) | 1029 |
| 2022-10-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1028.5767619261] expected: 0.33184502016684 vs cgregg (907) | 1039 |
| 2022-11-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1039.1958025714] expected: 0.30485137667707 vs cgregg (896) | 1017 |
| 2022-11-06 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.63841257276703 vs Chris Gregg (918.24475594633) | 997 |
| 2022-11-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 996.57079767146] expected: 0.41789901079704 vs cgregg (939) | 1010 |
| 2022-11-14 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.61909027483402 vs Chris Gregg (925.62723165449) | 1022 |
| 2022-11-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1022.1891112053] expected: 0.34784097027543 vs cgregg (913) | 1033 |
| 2022-11-27 | Rated: 1033. expected: 0.68023461430908 vs Chris Gregg (901.86908895119) | 1043 |
| 2022-12-05 | Rated: 1043. expected: 0.70501982882439 vs Chris Gregg (891.63659660908) | 1020 |
| 2022-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1020.4393654776] expected: 0.35144029183484 vs cgregg (914) | 1000 |
| 2022-12-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.59280822478629 vs Chris Gregg (934.75391066128) | 997 |
| 2022-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 997.03013680684] expected: 0.41585689847892 vs cgregg (938) | 978 |
| 2022-12-26 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.53062545800855 vs Chris Gregg (956.69257924867) | 961 |
| 2023-01-05 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.48177075471508 vs Chris Gregg (973.67259390495) | 946 |
| 2023-01-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 945.58333584912] expected: 0.5621583875874 vs cgregg (989) | 932 |
| 2023-01-07 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.39920666147875 vs Chris Gregg (1003.0109315972) | 951 |
| 2023-01-07 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.22538683268] expected: 0.54702704930419 vs cgregg (984) | 969 |
| 2023-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.73025241041] expected: 0.49607093181401 vs cgregg (966) | 985 |
| 2023-01-26 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.55002023033666 vs Chris Gregg (950.12573018195) | 999 |
| 2023-02-03 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.59006455487436 vs Chris Gregg (935.72637755272) | 980 |
| 2023-02-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.11793424402] expected: 0.46391523188715 vs cgregg (955) | 963 |
| 2023-02-19 | Rated: 963. expected: 0.48682835772375 vs Chris Gregg (972.15471257961) | 979 |
| 2023-02-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 979.42149255284] expected: 0.46634472877917 vs cgregg (956) | 994 |
| 2023-03-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 994.34452387377] expected: 0.42382867179272 vs cgregg (941) | 976 |
| 2023-03-05 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.52381733977148 vs Chris Gregg (959.43748250263) | 959 |
| 2023-03-18 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.47526793242736 vs Chris Gregg (976.19963737532) | 976 |
| 2023-03-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 975.79142616232] expected: 0.47585399202969 vs cgregg (959) | 991 |
| 2023-03-21 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.56755005244248 vs Chris Gregg (943.77267225505) | 1005 |
| 2023-03-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1004.8383983218] expected: 0.39393425249146 vs cgregg (930) | 1017 |
| 2023-03-25 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.63954217949607 vs Chris Gregg (917.39410392027) | 997 |
| 2023-03-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 996.53465025613] expected: 0.41654993269669 vs cgregg (938) | 978 |
| 2023-04-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 977.86424810242] expected: 0.62012546256894 vs jrwusmc (1063) | 998 |
| 2023-06-10 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.49712180042519 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1014 |
| 2023-06-10 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.49712180042519 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1014 |
| 2023-07-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1014.0921023864] expected: 0.30011922103105 vs wwillow (867) | 992 |
| 2023-07-18 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.59255230059617 vs John Barkoviak (926.93807253789) | 1005 |
| 2023-07-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1005.0383263809] expected: 0.43130449234304 vs cgregg (957) | 1019 |
| 2023-07-19 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.60738894522431 vs Chris Gregg (943.19825624502) | 1032 |
| 2023-08-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1031.5635537528] expected: 0.35918796419642 vs cgregg (931) | 1011 |
| 2023-08-05 | Rated: 1011. expected: 0.58479162372942 vs Chris Gregg (951.50598514571) | 992 |
| 2023-08-17 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.53130392476847 vs Chris Gregg (970.21931710506) | 975 |
| 2023-08-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 974.99827440741] expected: 0.51726500479924 vs cgregg (987) | 960 |
| 2023-08-19 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.43921524117199 vs Chris Gregg (1002.4475198464) | 978 |
| 2023-08-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 977.9451122825] expected: 0.5101514043952 vs cgregg (985) | 994 |
| 2023-08-22 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.536380972866 vs Chris Gregg (968.67515505935) | 1009 |
| 2023-08-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1008.8358088683] expected: 0.42173373093969 vs cgregg (954) | 1022 |
| 2023-09-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1022.3312882584] expected: 0.38504697810175 vs cgregg (941) | 1003 |
| 2023-09-01 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.56060607880153 vs Chris Gregg (960.67849670074) | 985 |
| 2023-09-02 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.5091835599295 vs Chris Gregg (978.61789122239) | 1001 |
| 2023-09-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1000.7061260823] expected: 0.44594856390335 vs cgregg (963) | 1015 |
| 2023-09-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1014.9764801272] expected: 0.40617727035745 vs cgregg (949) | 1028 |
| 2023-09-10 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.6293854221777 vs Chris Gregg (936.00232734856) | 1040 |
| 2023-09-24 | Rated: 1040. expected: 0.66081504809771 vs Chris Gregg (924.14266085825) | 1019 |
| 2023-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1018.8539184609] expected: 0.39528808825534 vs cgregg (945) | 1000 |
| 2023-10-21 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.55112406202791 vs Chris Gregg (964.35078117583) | 982 |
| 2023-10-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 982.36403001511] expected: 0.49947611888784 vs cgregg (982) | 966 |
| 2023-10-29 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.45405415521538 vs Chris Gregg (998.01676419559) | 967 |
| 2023-11-19 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.45758138160734 vs Chris Gregg (996.54649716248) | 984 |
| 2023-11-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.35739578857] expected: 0.49229069870637 vs cgregg (979) | 1000 |
| 2023-11-30 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.55269583847731 vs Chris Gregg (963.2466976414) | 982 |
| 2023-11-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 982.31373316873] expected: 0.49810939500387 vs cgregg (981) | 966 |
| 2024-02-03 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.45122566414026 vs J. Boord (1000) | 952 |
| 2024-02-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.56077874751] expected: 0.56502199272237 vs cgregg (997) | 970 |
| 2024-02-17 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.48716691996125 vs Chris Gregg (978.91929623288) | 986 |
| 2024-02-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 986.41065856124] expected: 0.62749241142311 vs jrwusmc (1077) | 974 |
| 2024-03-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 974.49041572678] expected: 0.67315536999877 vs jrwusmc (1100) | 996 |
| 2024-03-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 996.03138756674] expected: 0.45260671706398 vs cgregg (963) | 979 |
| 2024-03-28 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.49781747252597 vs Chris Gregg (980.51658505395) | 963 |
| 2024-04-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 963.06984087917] expected: 0.54724890836479 vs cgregg (996) | 981 |
| 2024-04-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.58180594684] expected: 0.49628455096025 vs cgregg (978) | 996 |
| 2024-04-11 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 996.46291157757] expected: 0.62876676124607 vs jrwusmc (1088) | 985 |
| 2024-04-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.58344793744] expected: 0.46754550032475 vs cgregg (962) | 1000 |
| 2024-04-26 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.57563275323244 vs Chris Gregg (947.03854398961) | 982 |
| 2024-04-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 981.57975189656] expected: 0.4761579142708 vs cgregg (965) | 965 |
| 2024-04-28 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.47589488178767 vs Chris Gregg (981.76294674333) | 950 |
| 2024-04-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 949.77136378279] expected: 0.56755190111511 vs cgregg (997) | 936 |
| 2024-06-04 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.39393433379495 vs Chris Gregg (1010.8383391643) | 923 |
| 2024-06-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 923.39410131856] expected: 0.63954218294861 vs cgregg (1023) | 912 |
| 2024-06-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 911.85945117292] expected: 0.76510669847282 vs jrwusmc (1117) | 904 |
| 2024-06-20 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.32051243717383 vs Chris Gregg (1034.5346501456) | 926 |
| 2024-06-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 925.74360201044] expected: 0.62299691657527 vs cgregg (1013) | 946 |
| 2024-07-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 945.67950334085] expected: 0.65233057834588 vs jrwusmc (1055) | 935 |
| 2024-08-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 934.55408184791] expected: 0.50927535771172 vs wwillow (941) | 951 |
| 2024-08-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.85089329469] expected: 0.6752284561944 vs jrwusmc (1078) | 972 |
| 2024-08-26 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.46972341180474 vs Chris Gregg (993.06409866959) | 989 |
| 2024-08-31 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.51856289558587 vs Chris Gregg (976.09524784734) | 972 |
| 2024-10-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 972.40598734125] expected: 0.52960250577254 vs cgregg (993) | 957 |
| 2024-10-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 957.35326752597] expected: 0.57237458398541 vs cgregg (1008) | 944 |
| 2024-10-31 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 943.66925421351] expected: 0.61495228248245 vs jrwusmc (1025) | 963 |
| 2024-11-08 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 963.34772725294] expected: 0.58361461517817 vs cgregg (1022) | 950 |
| 2024-11-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.02339493865] expected: 0.61990962789216 vs cgregg (1035) | 970 |
| 2024-11-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 969.8605030312] expected: 0.56459790187785 vs cgregg (1015) | 956 |
| 2024-11-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.92763589129] expected: 0.6036359891088 vs cgregg (1029) | 943 |
| 2024-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 943.24398754277] expected: 0.62771664788683 vs jrwusmc (1034) | 963 |
| 2024-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 963.33092027515] expected: 0.61131796962624 vs cgregg (1042) | 951 |
| 2025-02-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.89309530319] expected: 0.68145543583366 vs jrwusmc (1083) | 941 |
| 2025-06-25 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.53892149790181 vs John Barkoviak (913.89974615696) | 924 |
| 2025-07-13 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.48971863100687 vs John Barkoviak (931.14523408982) | 940 |
| 2025-08-01 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.53617901821274 vs John Barkoviak (914.81623028204) | 923 |
| 2025-08-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 922.84227141719] expected: 0.74490297783866 vs jrwusmc (1109) | 915 |
Games logged: 99 Played Won Lost
Games won: 94
Attacking Win: 46.6% (103 attempts)
Defending Win: 48.91% (92 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
| Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |
| Grey rows indicate games logged by your opponent. |
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-10 to 2021-01-09 [30 days])