User: lokatt
| Name: | Ingemar Gardell |
| Registered on: | 2020-01-04 11:27:13 |
| Last Login: | 2025-02-21 21:56:28 |
User Notes:
Owns: 677 Scenarios
Played: 78 (70 unique scenarios: 10%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 864 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
Worst losing streak: 6 games lost (From 2020-04-06 to 2020-06-12 [67 days])
| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1000] expected: 0.5 vs jacelm (1000) | 1016 |
| 2019-12-01 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.54592192278048 vs Jacob Elmqvist (984) | 1031 |
| 2019-12-08 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1030.530498471] expected: 0.41236478336913 vs jacelm (969) | 1012 |
| 2019-12-10 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1011.7261715388] expected: 0.46590827291905 vs jacelm (988) | 1027 |
| 2019-12-12 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1026.6352362722] expected: 0.42342006482331 vs jacelm (973) | 1008 |
| 2019-12-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1008.1846783466] expected: 0.47528940757391 vs jacelm (991) | 991 |
| 2019-12-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 991.39393938896] expected: 0.5238798607881 vs jacelm (1008) | 976 |
| 2019-12-14 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 976.15809493418] expected: 0.56700542703834 vs jacelm (1023) | 994 |
| 2019-12-16 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 994.3022685994] expected: 0.51539040967419 vs jacelm (1005) | 1011 |
| 2019-12-17 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1010.794761709] expected: 0.46867589365874 vs jacelm (989) | 1026 |
| 2019-12-18 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1025.7923903061] expected: 0.42601200260856 vs jacelm (974) | 1039 |
| 2019-12-21 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1039.4247743895] expected: 0.38764890568872 vs jacelm (960) | 1020 |
| 2019-12-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1019.8295393716] expected: 0.44293046935966 vs jacelm (980) | 1034 |
| 2019-12-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1034.0033143911] expected: 0.40336623505647 vs jacelm (966) | 1047 |
| 2019-12-28 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1046.9110339129] expected: 0.36804909562383 vs jacelm (953) | 1027 |
| 2019-12-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1026.6886049728] expected: 0.4233450645122 vs jacelm (973) | 1040 |
| 2020-01-04 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1040.2356470372] expected: 0.38517734998667 vs jacelm (959) | 1021 |
| 2020-01-07 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1020.5613222368] expected: 0.44047212061312 vs jacelm (979) | 1035 |
| 2020-01-11 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 1034.6564300964] expected: 0.40107819375052 vs jacelm (965) | 1015 |
| 2020-01-19 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1015.4909322964] expected: 0.45480460202808 vs jacelm (984) | 1030 |
| 2020-01-25 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1030.0446795613] expected: 0.41304262098055 vs jacelm (969) | 1011 |
| 2020-02-03 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 1011.2620434327] expected: 0.46657316190658 vs jacelm (988) | 994 |
| 2020-02-10 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 994.19238461374] expected: 0.51554839407089 vs jacelm (1005) | 979 |
| 2020-02-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 978.689933224] expected: 0.56058986207121 vs jacelm (1021) | 997 |
| 2020-02-15 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 996.62880881028] expected: 0.50916785354884 vs jacelm (1003) | 981 |
| 2020-02-23 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 980.92218012385] expected: 0.55458003404427 vs jacelm (1019) | 967 |
| 2020-02-24 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 966.66874121326] expected: 0.59431522513599 vs jacelm (1033) | 986 |
| 2020-02-26 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 985.68682841761] expected: 0.54065597135729 vs jacelm (1014) | 971 |
| 2020-02-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 970.98781950105] expected: 0.58271893444289 vs jacelm (1029) | 958 |
| 2020-03-02 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 957.63482540322] expected: 0.61907996645868 vs jacelm (1042) | 977 |
| 2020-03-14 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 977.4453843299] expected: 0.56377006024203 vs jacelm (1022) | 979 |
| 2020-04-06 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 979.48602625764] expected: 0.57921802142011 vs jacelm (1035) | 998 |
| 2020-04-18 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 998.02100294309] expected: 0.52585078611543 vs jacelm (1016) | 983 |
| 2020-04-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 982.84822809878] expected: 0.56885567992673 vs jacelm (1031) | 969 |
| 2020-04-25 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 969.05160985643] expected: 0.60759023285238 vs jacelm (1045) | 956 |
| 2020-05-09 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 956.49449730771] expected: 0.64205914064042 vs jacelm (1058) | 945 |
| 2020-05-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 945.0403898082] expected: 0.68748829767669 vs jacelm (1082) | 935 |
| 2020-06-12 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 935.04001533386] expected: 0.71167526096653 vs jacelm (1092) | 926 |
| 2020-07-09 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 925.81362368479] expected: 0.77433550591961 vs jacelm (1140) | 951 |
| 2020-08-03 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 950.59235987422] expected: 0.73296682565404 vs jacelm (1126) | 958 |
| 2021-01-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 958.04729829514] expected: 0.76594586353971 vs jacelm (1164) | 951 |
| 2021-02-08 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 950.55756592842] expected: 0.78056614777617 vs jacelm (1171) | 944 |
| 2021-02-11 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 943.53568265725] expected: 0.79407814193262 vs jacelm (1178) | 937 |
| 2021-02-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 936.9461831991] expected: 0.81798375975399 vs jacelm (1198) | 931 |
| 2021-05-26 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 931.12166351122] expected: 0.67866420689091 vs jacelm (1061) | 921 |
| 2021-11-05 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 920.83891813173] expected: 0.6714451733489 vs jacelm (1045) | 910 |
| 2021-11-13 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 910.3251636789] expected: 0.6821646892924 vs jacelm (1043) | 932 |
| 2021-11-16 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 932.15443373625] expected: 0.6251430908039 vs jacelm (1021) | 920 |
| 2021-11-20 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 920.15901264198] expected: 0.65691241584551 vs jacelm (1033) | 909 |
| 2021-11-22 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 909.18020994904] expected: 0.68483575000907 vs jacelm (1044) | 899 |
| 2021-11-24 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 899.09495394933] expected: 0.7092419250661 vs jacelm (1054) | 922 |
| 2021-11-28 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 921.79069555144] expected: 0.65218539840142 vs jacelm (1031) | 911 |
| 2021-11-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 910.66062830029] expected: 0.68049557554042 vs jacelm (1042) | 900 |
| 2021-12-05 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 900.43648671758] expected: 0.70525933449855 vs jacelm (1052) | 891 |
| 2021-12-14 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 891.00478542153] expected: 0.74581798618508 vs jacelm (1078) | 883 |
| 2021-12-30 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 882.87096097946] expected: 0.74487159427308 vs jacelm (1069) | 907 |
| 2022-02-06 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 906.7068519962] expected: 0.68043772020669 vs jacelm (1038) | 928 |
| 2022-12-27 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 928.48085904281] expected: 0.546662622434 vs jacelm (961) | 914 |
| 2023-01-12 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 913.9740629607] expected: 0.57290878452975 vs jacelm (965) | 900 |
| 2023-01-20 | ** Ingemar Gardell [Rating: 900.30714406565] expected: 0.6113504898349 vs jacelm (979) | 888 |
| 2024-10-27 | Rated: 888. expected: 0.4700159595442 vs Jacob Elmqvist (908.86007479263) | 905 |
| 2024-11-02 | Rated: 905. expected: 0.51884264525128 vs Jacob Elmqvist (891.90058549804) | 888 |
| 2024-11-11 | Rated: 888. expected: 0.47052722591271 vs Jacob Elmqvist (908.50355014608) | 873 |
| 2024-11-18 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.42774702951846 vs Jacob Elmqvist (923.56042137529) | 859 |
| 2024-11-23 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.38925768481318 vs Jacob Elmqvist (937.24832631988) | 847 |
| 2024-12-05 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.35635611572004 vs Jacob Elmqvist (949.7045722339) | 836 |
| 2024-12-10 | Rated: 836. expected: 0.32735348896871 vs Jacob Elmqvist (961.10796793694) | 826 |
| 2024-12-14 | Rated: 826. expected: 0.30194674758205 vs Jacob Elmqvist (971.58327958394) | 848 |
| 2024-12-20 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 848.33770407737] expected: 0.64094285637117 vs jacelm (949) | 837 |
| 2025-01-03 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.32940782420045 vs Jacob Elmqvist (960.48982859612) | 826 |
| 2025-01-04 | Rated: 826. expected: 0.30261740694529 vs Jacob Elmqvist (971.03087897054) | 848 |
| 2025-01-16 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.37930491898829 vs Jacob Elmqvist (933.55593150947) | 836 |
| 2025-01-19 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 835.86224259237] expected: 0.65339677826902 vs jacelm (946) | 825 |
| 2025-01-25 | Rated: 825. expected: 0.31856405990129 vs Jacob Elmqvist (957.09130309539) | 847 |
| 2025-01-26 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.37561292166169 vs Jacob Elmqvist (935.28535301223) | 835 |
| 2025-02-18 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 834.98038650683] expected: 0.663599302738 vs jacelm (953) | 856 |
| 2025-03-08 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 856.21556419444] expected: 0.60736518582983 vs jacelm (932) | 844 |
| 2025-03-16 | ** ingemar gardell [Rating: 843.651250141] expected: 0.64185173858748 vs jacelm (945) | 864 |
Games logged: 14 Played Won Lost
Games won: 29
Attacking Win: 28.57% (42 attempts)
Defending Win: 50% (36 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
| Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |
| Grey rows indicate games logged by your opponent. |
Worst losing streak: 6 games lost (From 2020-04-06 to 2020-06-12 [67 days])