Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 13
Attacker wins (British/American): 4
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1139 | 1078 | 59% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1185 | 1051 | 68% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1075 | 58% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 916 | 996 | 39% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1102 | 1133 | 46% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 1013 | 990 | 53% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 990 | 1013 | 47% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1121 | 1127 | 49% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1152 | 713 | 93% | 2012-11-13 | Won |
| 963 | 916 | 57% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1081 | 1065 | 52% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1100 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1057 | 988 | 60% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (4 wins) average ELOs: 1064.2 vs 1018.8 has a 56.48% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).